The "Father of Modern Space Flight," Wernher von Braun, died JUNE 16, 1977.
He acknowledged his debt to the "Father of Modern Rocketry," American scientist Robert H. Goddard (1882-1945):
"Goddard's rockets ... may have been rather crude by present-day standards, but they blazed the trail and incorporated many features used in our most modern rockets and space vehicles."
After the war, Wernher von Braun emigrated to the United States.
In 1958, he launched America's first satellite.
Von Braun worked on the U.S. guided missile program and was director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
Wernher von Braun received the National Medal of Science in 1975, and is considered "without doubt, the greatest rocket scientist in history."
The Founder of the National Space Institute, Wernher von Braun stated:
"In this age of space flight, when we use the modern tools of science to advance into new regions of human activity, the Bible -- this grandiose, stirring history of the gradual revelation and unfolding of the moral law -- remains in every way an up-to-date book.
Our knowledge and use of the laws of nature that enable us to fly to the Moon also enable us to destroy our home planet with the atom bomb.
... Science itself does not address the question whether we should use the power at our disposal for good or for evil.
The guidelines of what we ought to do are furnished in the moral law of God ...
It is no longer enough that we pray that God may be with us on our side. We must learn to pray that we may be on God's side."
Wernher von Braun wrote in This Week Magazine, January 1, 1961:
"But I can't help feeling at the same time that this space effort of ours is bigger even than a rivalry between the United States and Russia.
The heavens beyond us are enormous beyond comprehension, and the further we penetrate them, the greater will be our human understanding of the great universal purpose, the Divine Will itself."
America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations
Wernher von Braun wrote to the California State Board of Education, September 14, 1972:
"Dear Mr. Grose:
In response to your inquiry about my personal views concerning the 'Case for DESIGN' as a viable scientific theory or the origin of the universe, life and man, I am pleased to make the following observations.
For me, the idea of a creation is not conceivable without evoking the necessity of design. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all.
... In the world round us, we can behold the obvious manifestations of an ordered, structured plan or design. We can see the will of the species to live and propagate.
And we are humbled by the powerful forces at work on a galactic scale, and the purposeful orderliness of nature that endows a tiny and ungainly seed with the ability to develop into a beautiful flower.
The better we understand the intricacies of the universe and all harbors, the more reason we have found to marvel at the inherent design upon which it is based ..."
Wernher von Braun continued:
"While the admission of a design for the universe ultimately raises the question of a Designer (a subject outside of science), the scientific method does not allow us to exclude data which lead to the conclusion that the universe, life and man are based on design.
To be forced to believe only one conclusion -- that everything in the universe happened by chance -- would violate the very objectivity of science itself.
Certainly there are those who argue that the universe evolved out of a random process, but what random process could produce the brain of a man or the system or the human eye? ..."
Wernher von Braun added:
"Some people say that science has been unable to prove the existence of a Designer.
They admit that many of the miracles in the world around us are hard to understand, and they do not deny that the universe, as modern science sees it, is indeed a far more wondrous thing than the creation medieval man could perceive.
But they still maintain that since science has provided us with so many answers the day will soon arrive when we will be able to understand even the creation of the fundamental laws of nature without a Divine intent. They challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun?
... Many men who are intelligent and of good faith say they cannot visualize a Designer. Well, can a physicist visualize an electron?
The electron is materially inconceivable and yet it is so perfectly known through its effects that we use it to illuminate our cities, guide our airlines through the night skies and take the most accurate measurements ..."
Wernher von Braun stated further:
"What strange rationale makes some physicists accept the inconceivable electrons as real while refusing to accept the reality of a Designer on the ground that they cannot conceive Him?
I am afraid that, although they really do not understand the electron either, they are ready to accept it because they managed to produce a rather clumsy mechanical model of it borrowed from rather limited experience in other fields, but they would not know how to begin building a model of God.
... I have discussed the aspect of a Designer at some length because it might be that the primary resistance to acknowledging the 'Case for Design' as a viable scientific alternative to the current 'Case for Chance' lies in the inconceivability, in some scientists' minds, of a Designer.
The inconceivability of some ultimate issue (which will always lie outside scientific resolution) should not be allowed to rule out any theory that explains the interrelationship of observed data and is useful for prediction ..."
Wernher von Braun concluded:
"We in NASA were often asked what the real reason was for the amazing string of successes we had with our Apollo flights to the Moon. I think the only honest answer we could give was that we tried to never overlook anything.
It is in that same sense of scientific honesty that I endorse the presentation of alternative theories for the origin of the universe, life and man in the science classroom.
It would be an error to overlook the possibility that the universe was planned rather than happened by chance. With kindest regards. Sincerely, Wernher von Braun."
American Minute is a registered trademark. Permission granted to forward, reprint or duplicate with acknowledgement to Bill Federer www.AmericanMinute.com
He acknowledged his debt to the "Father of Modern Rocketry," American scientist Robert H. Goddard (1882-1945):
"Goddard's rockets ... may have been rather crude by present-day standards, but they blazed the trail and incorporated many features used in our most modern rockets and space vehicles."
After the war, Wernher von Braun emigrated to the United States.
In 1958, he launched America's first satellite.
Von Braun worked on the U.S. guided missile program and was director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
Wernher von Braun received the National Medal of Science in 1975, and is considered "without doubt, the greatest rocket scientist in history."
The Founder of the National Space Institute, Wernher von Braun stated:
"In this age of space flight, when we use the modern tools of science to advance into new regions of human activity, the Bible -- this grandiose, stirring history of the gradual revelation and unfolding of the moral law -- remains in every way an up-to-date book.
Our knowledge and use of the laws of nature that enable us to fly to the Moon also enable us to destroy our home planet with the atom bomb.
... Science itself does not address the question whether we should use the power at our disposal for good or for evil.
The guidelines of what we ought to do are furnished in the moral law of God ...
It is no longer enough that we pray that God may be with us on our side. We must learn to pray that we may be on God's side."
Wernher von Braun wrote in This Week Magazine, January 1, 1961:
"But I can't help feeling at the same time that this space effort of ours is bigger even than a rivalry between the United States and Russia.
The heavens beyond us are enormous beyond comprehension, and the further we penetrate them, the greater will be our human understanding of the great universal purpose, the Divine Will itself."
America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations
Wernher von Braun wrote to the California State Board of Education, September 14, 1972:
"Dear Mr. Grose:
In response to your inquiry about my personal views concerning the 'Case for DESIGN' as a viable scientific theory or the origin of the universe, life and man, I am pleased to make the following observations.
For me, the idea of a creation is not conceivable without evoking the necessity of design. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all.
... In the world round us, we can behold the obvious manifestations of an ordered, structured plan or design. We can see the will of the species to live and propagate.
And we are humbled by the powerful forces at work on a galactic scale, and the purposeful orderliness of nature that endows a tiny and ungainly seed with the ability to develop into a beautiful flower.
The better we understand the intricacies of the universe and all harbors, the more reason we have found to marvel at the inherent design upon which it is based ..."
Wernher von Braun continued:
"While the admission of a design for the universe ultimately raises the question of a Designer (a subject outside of science), the scientific method does not allow us to exclude data which lead to the conclusion that the universe, life and man are based on design.
To be forced to believe only one conclusion -- that everything in the universe happened by chance -- would violate the very objectivity of science itself.
Certainly there are those who argue that the universe evolved out of a random process, but what random process could produce the brain of a man or the system or the human eye? ..."
Wernher von Braun added:
"Some people say that science has been unable to prove the existence of a Designer.
They admit that many of the miracles in the world around us are hard to understand, and they do not deny that the universe, as modern science sees it, is indeed a far more wondrous thing than the creation medieval man could perceive.
But they still maintain that since science has provided us with so many answers the day will soon arrive when we will be able to understand even the creation of the fundamental laws of nature without a Divine intent. They challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun?
... Many men who are intelligent and of good faith say they cannot visualize a Designer. Well, can a physicist visualize an electron?
The electron is materially inconceivable and yet it is so perfectly known through its effects that we use it to illuminate our cities, guide our airlines through the night skies and take the most accurate measurements ..."
Wernher von Braun stated further:
"What strange rationale makes some physicists accept the inconceivable electrons as real while refusing to accept the reality of a Designer on the ground that they cannot conceive Him?
I am afraid that, although they really do not understand the electron either, they are ready to accept it because they managed to produce a rather clumsy mechanical model of it borrowed from rather limited experience in other fields, but they would not know how to begin building a model of God.
... I have discussed the aspect of a Designer at some length because it might be that the primary resistance to acknowledging the 'Case for Design' as a viable scientific alternative to the current 'Case for Chance' lies in the inconceivability, in some scientists' minds, of a Designer.
The inconceivability of some ultimate issue (which will always lie outside scientific resolution) should not be allowed to rule out any theory that explains the interrelationship of observed data and is useful for prediction ..."
Wernher von Braun concluded:
"We in NASA were often asked what the real reason was for the amazing string of successes we had with our Apollo flights to the Moon. I think the only honest answer we could give was that we tried to never overlook anything.
It is in that same sense of scientific honesty that I endorse the presentation of alternative theories for the origin of the universe, life and man in the science classroom.
It would be an error to overlook the possibility that the universe was planned rather than happened by chance. With kindest regards. Sincerely, Wernher von Braun."
American Minute is a registered trademark. Permission granted to forward, reprint or duplicate with acknowledgement to Bill Federer www.AmericanMinute.com